This article is broken into multiple pages to keep the size manageable. Until this notice is removed, one or more of the sub-pages is still under construction.
This article is part of a series on setting expectations for beginners to Astronomy, and giving general advice to help beginners plan an approach to the hobby.
Reading forum posts by absolute beginners to Astronomy, I note it is very common for them to want to tackle astrophotography right away. This is almost always an error, and several authors have written that failed attempts at astrophotography are one of the most common causes of beginner frustration and even of beginners leaving the hobby.
I think there are 3 reasons that early attempts at astrophotography are usually an error: It turns out it is easy to produce really bad images.
My qualifications? Like most of my articles, this one is based on personal experience, especially with failure: having done most things wrong myself, I hope to be able to help others avoid some of the most common errors. Let me be clear on this: I’m not good at this even yet. However, I have at least reached a point where I have a good understanding of the errors I made, and have developed thoughts on an organized approach to understanding this aspect of this hobby.
This article is not for experts. If you are an experienced astrophotographer, you know far more about this field than I do. There are no secrets or advanced techniques here. I am in awe of what experienced astrophotographers achieve, and I am learning from you.
This article is for you if you are a beginner to amateur astronomy and are thinking about including photography in your hobby, either right away or eventually.
Strangely, experienced photographers — even professional photographers — who are new to Astronomy may also find this series useful.
I am an experienced photographer, including a degree in photography, and thought that would make astrophotography easy. After all, I had already taken tens of thousands of photographs on a variety of good-quality camera equipment.
Wow, was I wrong. Astrophotography is quite different, and I had a lot of learning (and unlearning) to do.
This long article will be broken into a few sections. We’ll discuss a general overview of astrophotography and work out an organized way of looking at the different objectives, equipment, and techniques; I’ll offer a number of personal observations based on all the various mistakes I have made, and which ones I was eventually able to avoid or improve upon; and we’ll end by deriving a suggested “order of progression” in which it might make sense for a typical beginner to tackle this aspect of the hobby.
These articles are not instructions on technique – there are excellent books to help with that, and the main requirement is practice.
A personal warning: this is hard! That doesn’t mean it’s not fun. In fact, for me at least, it’s fun because it is hard. But beware of unrealistic expectations that will lead to disappointment.
You may have seen, or even had purchases influenced by, advertisements in Astronomy magazines (one vendor in particular comes to mind) showing amazing Hubble-like images and the claim that with their product “you can take photos like this the first night out”. The skeptic in you should ask whether that is really likely. Maybe an experienced astronomer & astrophotographer, already experienced in astrophotography and familiar with all their other equipment, could do this the first night out with the advertised camera or telescope. I certainly couldn’t. (Maybe it’s because I didn’t obey the ads and buy the specific equipment they were promoting.) I have acquaintances who produce stunning, publication-quality, award-winning results, but this is the result of decades of practice, not a mere product purchase.
You can have a lot of fun with astrophotography, and you will find even basic images and small successes very satisfying. But to get those publication-quality photos, expect to spend years perfecting your technique, and probably hundreds of hours and hundreds or thousands of dollars upgrading your equipment.
If it’s so hard, why do it?
That’s a personal question, of course. If you just want beautiful pictures, there are far easier ways to get them. However, if you want pictures you made yourself, this is really rewarding. Even better, the way to make this a great hobby that you enjoy every time out is to define your hobby as the process, not the result. That works for me: my hobby is learning astrophotography, not doing astrophotography. If I had defined my hobby as producing competition- or publication-quality images, I probably would have given up already.
Start simple, work in a sensible order, set realistic goals, and watch your results improve. That’s a great hobby.
The main content of this article is divided, below, into a few stand-alone articles for ease of reading (and writing). They are:
Old Hyvor comments